Hy-Pro vs. Brand X Filters in a Single-Pass Fluid Transfer

Posted by Jim Harlan on Tue, Feb. 07, 2017
Find me on:

The Problemfluid transfer filtration

Today’s oil suppliers are often required to provide fluid at or below a specified ISO Cleanliness Code. One such supplier was experiencing short filter element life (15 days) on the system (7 element multi-round housing) used to achieve the required ISO Cleanliness Code of 18/16/13 in a single pass as 15W-40 oil is transferred from their bulk storage tanks to tanker trucks for delivery.

 

The Solution

Conduct element life trials with Brand X elements and Hy-Pro elements to discover which element lasts longer and which is more efficient at removing particulate contamination from the fluid. 

 

dirt in fluid

 

The Results

The Hy-Pro DFE Rated G8 Dualglass element lasted six times longer (90 days) than the Brand X element (15 days). The Brand X element cleaned the fluid to the required code of 18/16/13 but the Hy-Pro element exceeded requirements by dropping the ISO code to 12/10/7.

These changes resulted in a savings of more than $40,000 per year, realized through extending element life and reducing maintenance hours and element disposal costs.  

 

savings with hy-pro DFE rated filter elements


Fluid Transfer Application Case Study

 

1Value rounded up to nearest whole number.

2Calculations based on 10gpm flow rate & 24/7 operation. Graphical representations scaled proportionately.

Topics: ISO 4406, filtration, breathers, offline filtration, case study, fluid transfer, DFE

   

Subscribe via E-mail

Popular Posts